![]() Family communication: Cohesion and change. Like many of the others in this area, it covers the self in interaction, perception processes, language and nonverbal communication, and social relationships, but it also provides coverage of cultural and gender issues and their shaping of social interaction. This introductory undergraduate text takes a social science approach to understanding human interaction, putting a particular focus on the ways in which social interaction fulfills important human needs. Martin’s.Īiming for a higher-level audience but still accessible, this textbook uses the metaphor of creativity (getting what one wants) and constraint (following established rules) to explain the processes involved in interacting within and about organizations.įloyd, Kory. Organizational communication: Balancing creativity and constraint. It centers on teamwork, technology, and ethical collaboration, some of the foundations of social interaction in groups.Įisenberg, Eric M., Angela Tretheway, Marianne leGreco, and H. Llyod Goodall Jr. The tenth edition of this text provides a focus on basic principles and applications of group communication. Communicating in small groups: Principles and practices. 2017 includes interactions in organizations and other institutions.īeebe, Steven A., and John T. 2015 centers on the family Martin and Nakayama 2018 discusses intercultural interaction and Eisenberg, et al. 2005, emphasize interpersonal interaction. Some, such as Beebe and Masterson 2012 and Gastil 2010, focus on interaction in small groups others, such as Floyd 2017 McCornack and Morrison 2019 and Stewart, et al. They also help reveal the range of real-life contexts studied by social interaction researchers. Most of the textbooks in this area tend to be the product of scholars whose focus is on the constructs and patterns of human communication (i.e., a social science approach) rather than on the qualitative assessment of language and social interaction (for an exception, see Tracy and Robles 2013). The citations in this article focus on the key theories and methods that span these contexts of study. They also stem from different traditions, most notably sociological, following symbolic interactionism psychological, with a particular focus on cognitive and emotion-based processes that people bring with them to their interactions and linguistic, with a concern for language practices and the consequences of such practices. These research avenues can be very different from one another, and are sometimes seen as incompatible, but together allow the reader to witness the complexity of human engagement. ![]() Scholars who center their work in this area tend to be in one of two research lines: qualitative researchers who focus on the intricacies of language and nonverbal communication (i.e., commonly, those who align themselves with the area called language and social interaction) and scholars who use a variety of methods, but particularly social science approaches, to assess the constructs and patterns involved when people interact with one another. ![]() The study of social interaction involves the careful assessment of the practices of everyday communicating between people in various (usually) real-life contexts, such as doctor-patient visits, organizations, and human-computer communication. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |